Between 2003 and 2007, and without significant outside funding, the School District of Philadelphia created 25 new small high schools. This study, begun by Research for Action in 2006, follows the start-up and early implementation of these small high schools in Philadelphia. The study found that parents and students are interested in small high schools and that, across admission categories, these schools are beginning to make a difference for student engagement and achievement. Small high schools had higher rates of algebra passage and lower rates of suspension than comparative large schools. Teacher survey data and interviews with teachers and students indicated a greater sense of safety in small high schools and a more positive picture of teacher-student relationships. The positive differences were greatest for the small open admission neighborhood high schools. However, small size alone does not automatically create academic success or improved school climate. Some findings (e.g., attendance, tardiness) were mixed, with small schools not necessarily outperforming large schools and sometimes doing worse than their large counterparts. This research also details the varied start-up experiences of small schools created from the ground up compared with those converted from preexisting schools; the brand new schools had multiple advantages in the start-up process. More supports are needed if Philadelphia’s small high schools are to capitalize on the advantages of a smaller learning environment. Teachers and administrators articulated what next steps were needed to make schools more rigorous. This multi-method study is based on interviews with parents, students, teachers, and administrators as well as school observations, teacher surveys, application and enrollment data, and student achievement data.
![](https://www.researchforaction.org/wp-content/uploads/1970/01/Hartmann_T_Going_Small_Progress_and_Challenges_Small_HS-cover-540x540-1.jpg)
Going Small: Progress and Challenges of Philadelphia’s Small High Schools
Tracey A. Hartmann , Rebecca Reumann-Moore , Shani Aida Evans , Clarisse Haxton , Holly Plastaras Maluk , Ruth Curran Neild
Date: July 2009
Related Publications
![The report explores the impact of race-specific state higher education funding policies in Minnesota, New Jersey, and North Carolina. It examines how these policies aim to dismantle racial inequities by directing resources toward Black, Latinx, and Indigenous students and the institutions that serve them. The research highlights the challenges and successes of outcomes-based funding and tuition discount programs in addressing racial disparities in college access and success. It emphasizes the importance of prioritizing equity at both the student and institutional levels. Key findings include the positive impact of race-explicit metrics in funding formulas. These metrics have demonstrably steered resources toward under-resourced students and institutions serving diverse populations. However, the report also acknowledges the difficulties faced by Minority-Serving institutions and HBCUs when competing for funds under zero-sum models that limit overall resources. Additionally, the study explores the potential consequences of Promise programs on neighboring states, highlighting concerns about enrollment shifts and the need to consider the impact on community colleges. The recommendations emerging from the research urge policymakers to consider the full ecosystem of postsecondary institutions when designing funding initiatives, ensuring that funding programs are additive rather than overlapping to maximize outcomes. The report also emphasizes the importance of supporting additional costs of college in Promise programs to promote equity for students affected by systemic barriers. Furthermore, funding basic needs support and conducting needs assessments are recommended to ensure that initiatives effectively address pertinent needs and promote student success. More research is needed. The report suggests following the implementation of initiatives in North Carolina and Minnesota to assess their impact on racial disparities in completion. It also highlights the need to examine how institutions adjust their selection of optional metrics in outcomes-based funding formulas to better support marginalized student populations. Additionally, the study points toward the importance of exploring the intersection of outcomes-based funding and Promise programs to understand their implications on institutional funding and student success in higher education.](https://www.researchforaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/examining-effectiveness-race-specific-funding-strategies-higher-ed.jpg)
Publication
Examining the Effectiveness of Race-Specific Funding Strategies in Higher Education
Kri Burkander, Shafiqua Little, Mycaeri Atkinson
![](https://www.researchforaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/for-the-good-of-the-city-catto-evaluation2.jpg)
Publication
“For the Good of the City” An Early Evaluation of the Catto Scholarship
Kri Burkander, Karin Gegenheimer, Alita Robinson
![revisiting-research-on-school-closings-cover-image](https://www.researchforaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/revisiting-research-on-school-closings-cover-image2.jpg)
Publication
Revisiting Research on School Closings: Key Learnings for District and Community Leaders
Mary Eddins, Maja Pehrson, Kevin Burgess
![Responding, Reimagining, Realizing: Out-of-School Coordination in a New Era](https://www.researchforaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/how-ostis-responded-pandemic-racial-reckoning.jpg)
Publication
Responding, Reimagining, Realizing: Out-of-School Coordination in a New Era
Tracey A. Hartmann, Wendy McClanahan, Mark Duffy, Leana Cabral, Carolyn Barnes, Ph.D, Brian Christens, Ph.D
![Personalized, Competency-Based Learning in Arizona: A Case Study of Implementation in Yuma Union High School District](https://www.researchforaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/yuma-case-study-pbcl-az.jpg)
Publication
Personalized, Competency-Based Learning in Arizona: A Case Study of Implementation in Yuma Union High School District
Kevin Burgess, Julia Ransom, Mark Duffy
![Personalized, Competency-Based Learning in Arizona: A Case Study of Implementation in an Elementary School in Santa Cruz Valley Unified School District 35](https://www.researchforaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/pcbl-az-santa-cruz-case-study.jpg)
Publication
Personalized, Competency-Based Learning in Arizona: A Case Study of Implementation in an Elementary School in Santa Cruz Valley Unified School District 35
Julia Ransom, Kevin Burgess, Mark Duffy
![Personalized, Competency-Based Learning in Arizona: A Preliminary Report on Implementation and Student Outcomes](https://www.researchforaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/pcbl-az-implementation-outcomes-web.jpg)
Publication
Personalized, Competency-Based Learning in Arizona: A Preliminary Report on Implementation and Student Outcomes
Karin Gegenheimer, Dae Y. Kim, Mark Duffy
![](https://www.researchforaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/examining-the-impact-implementation-cost-effectiveness-completion-coaching-promise.jpg)
Publication
Examining the Impact, Implementation, and Cost Effectiveness of Completion Coaching in a Statewide College Promise Program
Dae Y. Kim, Karin Gegenheimer
![](https://www.researchforaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/cli-blueprint-for-early-learning-evaluation-report-img2.jpg)
Publication
Children’s Literacy Initiative’s Blueprint for Early Learning: Evaluation Report
Alyn Turner, Jill Pierce, Kendall LaParo
![Virtual Approaches Hold Promise for Expanding After- school Art Programming](https://www.researchforaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/virtual-approaches-web-feature-image.jpg)
Publication
Virtual Approaches Hold Promise for Expanding Afterschool Art Programming
Wendy McClanahan, Tracey A. Hartmann
![Small but Mighty](https://www.researchforaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/small-but-mighty-landing-page-img.jpg)
Publication
Small but Mighty: Lessons from Black Teachers’ Experiences in Allegheny County
Siettah Parks, Kevin Burgess, Leana Cabral, Mary Eddins, Alita Robinson
![Allegheny County Student and Teacher Race and Ethnicity, 2022-23](https://www.researchforaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/quant-supp-hero2.png)
Publication
Allegheny County Teacher and Student Demographics: 2022-23 Update
Mary Eddins, David Lapp, Anna Shaw-Amoah