The authors designed and administered a survey to new teachers entering the Philadelphia school system in 2002 in order to gather information about the teachers’ experiences with hiring, school placement, class and grade assignment, school start-up, supplies, and the overall environment in their school. The survey, which was completed by 366 teachers at a new teacher induction session on October 23rd, 2002, also contained questions about the teachers’ credentials, prior teaching experience, and certification status. (As of the end of October 2002, the District had hired a total of 598 new teachers). This report presents findings from the first stage of analysis of the data from the survey. The data showed the following: many teachers are hired late, often after the start of the school year, and most do not know where they will be teaching until shortly before or even after school starts; new teachers are given minimal support before school starts and in the early weeks (e.g., lack of essential supplies and paperwork, no contact with mentor, no professional development); greater than 50 percent of new teachers hired had no prior teaching experience other than student teaching and 50 percent have emergency certification. However, in general teachers did report that they felt their schools were safe, clean, and reasonably calm, and that they themselves were able to manage their classes effectively.
Preliminary Results: Philadelphia New Teacher Survey
Ruth Curran Neild , Kurt Spiridakis
Date: November 2002
Related Publications
![The report explores the impact of race-specific state higher education funding policies in Minnesota, New Jersey, and North Carolina. It examines how these policies aim to dismantle racial inequities by directing resources toward Black, Latinx, and Indigenous students and the institutions that serve them. The research highlights the challenges and successes of outcomes-based funding and tuition discount programs in addressing racial disparities in college access and success. It emphasizes the importance of prioritizing equity at both the student and institutional levels. Key findings include the positive impact of race-explicit metrics in funding formulas. These metrics have demonstrably steered resources toward under-resourced students and institutions serving diverse populations. However, the report also acknowledges the difficulties faced by Minority-Serving institutions and HBCUs when competing for funds under zero-sum models that limit overall resources. Additionally, the study explores the potential consequences of Promise programs on neighboring states, highlighting concerns about enrollment shifts and the need to consider the impact on community colleges. The recommendations emerging from the research urge policymakers to consider the full ecosystem of postsecondary institutions when designing funding initiatives, ensuring that funding programs are additive rather than overlapping to maximize outcomes. The report also emphasizes the importance of supporting additional costs of college in Promise programs to promote equity for students affected by systemic barriers. Furthermore, funding basic needs support and conducting needs assessments are recommended to ensure that initiatives effectively address pertinent needs and promote student success. More research is needed. The report suggests following the implementation of initiatives in North Carolina and Minnesota to assess their impact on racial disparities in completion. It also highlights the need to examine how institutions adjust their selection of optional metrics in outcomes-based funding formulas to better support marginalized student populations. Additionally, the study points toward the importance of exploring the intersection of outcomes-based funding and Promise programs to understand their implications on institutional funding and student success in higher education.](http://www.researchforaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/examining-effectiveness-race-specific-funding-strategies-higher-ed.jpg)
Publication
Examining the Effectiveness of Race-Specific Funding Strategies in Higher Education
Kri Burkander, Shafiqua Little, Mycaeri Atkinson
![](http://www.researchforaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/for-the-good-of-the-city-catto-evaluation2.jpg)
Publication
“For the Good of the City” An Early Evaluation of the Catto Scholarship
Kri Burkander, Karin Gegenheimer, Alita Robinson
![revisiting-research-on-school-closings-cover-image](http://www.researchforaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/revisiting-research-on-school-closings-cover-image2.jpg)
Publication
Revisiting Research on School Closings: Key Learnings for District and Community Leaders
Mary Eddins, Maja Pehrson, Kevin Burgess
![Responding, Reimagining, Realizing: Out-of-School Coordination in a New Era](http://www.researchforaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/how-ostis-responded-pandemic-racial-reckoning.jpg)
Publication
Responding, Reimagining, Realizing: Out-of-School Coordination in a New Era
Tracey A. Hartmann, Wendy McClanahan, Mark Duffy, Leana Cabral, Carolyn Barnes, Ph.D, Brian Christens, Ph.D
![Personalized, Competency-Based Learning in Arizona: A Case Study of Implementation in Yuma Union High School District](http://www.researchforaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/yuma-case-study-pbcl-az.jpg)
Publication
Personalized, Competency-Based Learning in Arizona: A Case Study of Implementation in Yuma Union High School District
Kevin Burgess, Julia Ransom, Mark Duffy
![Personalized, Competency-Based Learning in Arizona: A Case Study of Implementation in an Elementary School in Santa Cruz Valley Unified School District 35](http://www.researchforaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/pcbl-az-santa-cruz-case-study.jpg)
Publication
Personalized, Competency-Based Learning in Arizona: A Case Study of Implementation in an Elementary School in Santa Cruz Valley Unified School District 35
Julia Ransom, Kevin Burgess, Mark Duffy
![Personalized, Competency-Based Learning in Arizona: A Preliminary Report on Implementation and Student Outcomes](http://www.researchforaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/pcbl-az-implementation-outcomes-web.jpg)
Publication
Personalized, Competency-Based Learning in Arizona: A Preliminary Report on Implementation and Student Outcomes
Karin Gegenheimer, Dae Y. Kim, Mark Duffy
![](http://www.researchforaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/examining-the-impact-implementation-cost-effectiveness-completion-coaching-promise.jpg)
Publication
Examining the Impact, Implementation, and Cost Effectiveness of Completion Coaching in a Statewide College Promise Program
Dae Y. Kim, Karin Gegenheimer
![](http://www.researchforaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/cli-blueprint-for-early-learning-evaluation-report-img2.jpg)
Publication
Children’s Literacy Initiative’s Blueprint for Early Learning: Evaluation Report
Alyn Turner, Jill Pierce, Kendall LaParo
![Virtual Approaches Hold Promise for Expanding After- school Art Programming](http://www.researchforaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/virtual-approaches-web-feature-image.jpg)
Publication
Virtual Approaches Hold Promise for Expanding Afterschool Art Programming
Wendy McClanahan, Tracey A. Hartmann
![Small but Mighty](http://www.researchforaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/small-but-mighty-landing-page-img.jpg)
Publication
Small but Mighty: Lessons from Black Teachers’ Experiences in Allegheny County
Siettah Parks, Kevin Burgess, Leana Cabral, Mary Eddins, Alita Robinson
![Allegheny County Student and Teacher Race and Ethnicity, 2022-23](http://www.researchforaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/quant-supp-hero2.png)
Publication
Allegheny County Teacher and Student Demographics: 2022-23 Update
Mary Eddins, David Lapp, Anna Shaw-Amoah