THEORY
OF ACTION | AREAS
OF IMPACT | CORE
QUESTIONS
HISTORY | ANNUAL
REPORTS | eNEWS
ARCHIVE
FUNDERS | STAFF | BOARD

GUIDING
PRINCIPLES
-
High quality education opportunities should
be available to all including those traditionally
disadvantaged by poverty and racial discrimination.
- Democratic participation in education decisions
is important to successful, sustainable, and
publicly accountable school reform.
- Researchers and practitioners can learn from each other.
THEORY OF ACTION
Research for Action (RFA) employs multidisciplinary,
rigorous research, diverse teams, and feedback
that challenge
stakeholders
and researchers to interrogate assumptions and
listen to multiple voices. We share our research
with educators, parent and community leaders, students,
and policy makers in order to build a shared critique
of educational inequality and school reform that
is socially just. Through reciprocal relationships
with these stakeholders, we expand knowledge, foster
collaboration, and provoke public dialogue at local,
state, and national levels to promote equity, organizational
learning, democratic participation, and accountability
for school improvement.
AREAS OF IMPACT
RFA works to:
- Build public knowledge about economic, political,
and social contexts in order to understand
the opportunities for and barriers to greater
equity
in education.
- Increase the capacity of districts and practitioners
to make strategic decisions that improve instruction.
- Broaden the discourse about accountability
in order to foster shared responsibility for
improving learning outcomes and opportunities
for students.
- Enhance democratic participation
in school reform by making decision makers
aware of
the perspectives of those public education
stakeholders
who are
often disenfranchised
- Contribute to cross-sector dialogues that improve
civic capacity to think creatively about education
reform.
CORE RESEARCH QUESTIONS
How do particular policies, partnerships or initiatives
contribute to high quality teaching and learning
in urban public schools? How do they contribute
to building strong, respectful, and mutually accountable
relationships among diverse students, parents,
and educators?
What strategies used in schools, in districts, in communities, and in the larger social and political environment, foster equitable educational opportunities for urban youth? What strategies in these different sites sustain public accountability for urban schools and urban school systems?
What processes for reflection, communication,
and feedback work to sustain continuous improvement
in urban schools and urban school districts? How
do community groups, students, and partner organizations
as well as those working within schools
and districts, participate in these learning processes?
HISTORY
RFA is a Philadelphia-based,
non-profit organization engaged in education research
and evaluation. Founded in 1992, RFA works
with public school districts, educational institutions,
and community organizations to improve the educational
opportunities for those traditionally disadvantaged
by race/ethnicity, class, gender, language/cultural
difference, and ability/disability. Research for
Action was founded by women who aimed to connect
their social activism, feminist beliefs, and professional
practice as education researchers. Basic
tenets for RFA's approach to evaluation emerge
from feminist theory.
RFA continues to draw national attention as an
organization that exemplifies the
value of being
a locally-focused, applied research organization.
We were mentioned in a recent issue of Voices
in Urban Education (VUE),
published by the Annenberg Institute for School
Reform, as being an organization that typifies
the kind of close relationship that helps
bridge the gap between research and practice
and ensures that research is attuned to local
conditions.
ANNUAL
REPORTS 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004
FUNDERS*
RFA is grateful to the following
foundations which support our research.
Annenberg
Foundation | Carnegie
Corporation of New York | Samuel S. Fels Fund
Edward W. Hazen Foundation | Charles Stewart Mott Foundation | William Penn Foundation The Pew Charitable Trusts | The Philadelphia Foundation |
Spencer Foundation | Surdna Foundation
* The statements made and views expressed
on this site and in RFA publications are solely
those
of
the
authors.
[TOP OF PAGE]
|